DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gortarez, 402 P.2d 992.

65 citing documents.

  • State v. Chambers 414 P.2d 742 Ariz. 1966
    See also, , ; State v. Schumacher, supra; , ; , .
  • Yanez v. State 412 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Yanez v. State 412 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • State v. Jackson 412 P.2d 36 Ariz. 1966
  • State v. Jackson 412 P.2d 36 Ariz. 1966
  • State v. Smith 407 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Smith 407 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Flores 405 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Flores 405 P.2d 901 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
    the *593 Arizona Supreme Court, at page 998 of the Pacific Reporter, quoted an earlier Arizona case as follows: “Improper remarks of the county attorney when provoked by defendant’s arguments are not generally speaking, grounds for reversal.” This statement is applicable to the case now under co
  • State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
    In the time since this appeal was filed and the propositions of law presented herein were briefed
  • State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
    State v. Gortarez (No. 1440), , State v. Schumacher (No. 1430)
  • State v. Chavez 403 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Chavez 403 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1965