Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baca v. Smith, 604 P.2d 617.

74 citing documents.

State v. Crotty 731 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Crotty 731 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
He also requested that a
State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal Court 735 P.2d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal Court 735 P.2d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Consequently, , the Arizona Supreme Court held that officers must, upon request, preserve a second sample.
Montano v. Superior Court Pima County 719 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1986
Montano v. Superior Court Pima County 719 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1986
the defendant sought to suppress the results of a gas chromato-graph intoximeter, which yields no physical evidence comparable to the breathalyzer ampoule.
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
we held that a defendant has a right to have a second breath sample preserved, where the original sample is destroyed during testing.
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
the court held that where the breath sample was completely destroyed in the gas chromatograph intoximeter test, the police had to take and preserve another breath sample for use by the defendant, if requested.
White v. State 695 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
White v. State 695 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
However, neither was advised that he or she had a right to have a second sample of the test taken and preserved in accordance with the Supreme Court’s
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
concerned the gas chromatograph intoximeter, which yields no physical evidence comparable to a breathalyzer ampoule.
Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984
Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. City Court 635 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. City Court 635 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
applies when the breathalyzer is used to determine blood alcohol percentages.
State v. Peyatt 637 P.2d 751 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Peyatt 637 P.2d 751 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Although not raised by appellant in his motion for rehearing
State ex rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix 604 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1979
State ex rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix 604 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1979
This case is a companion case to Jesus V. Baca v. The Honorable Ralph G. Smith, et al.