Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State ex rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix, 604 P.2d 621.

17 citing documents.

Bennett v. Federal Express Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 23- 1061(H); Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
Golan v. Lee & co/st Paul Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm’n, : The medical benefits available or the appropriate treatment for the new, additional or previously undiscovered condition, as well as any adjustment or modification in the amount of compensation payable, or degree of disability established, can be appra
Cornelson v. Industrial Commission 17 P.3d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Coulter v. Industrial Commission 10 P.3d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-1061(H) (Supp.1999); e.g., Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
Stewart v. Industrial Commission 926 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1061(H) (1995) which provides in pertinent part: An employee may reopen his claim to secure an increase or rearrangement of compensation or additional benefits by filing with the commission a petition requesting the reopening of his claim upon the basis of new, additional or previously undiscovered temporary or permanent condition____ In Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n, , our supreme court set forth a two prong test to determine whether a claimant had satisfied the req
Federico v. Industrial Commission 923 P.2d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See, e.g., Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 859 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 845 P.2d 461 Ariz. 1993
See, e.g., Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n, , London v. Industrial Comm’n
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
§ 23-1061(H); Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n, , 359, , 623 (1980).
Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 784 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See Sneed v. Industrial Comm’n
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
(requiring a causal link between the original injury and an additional condition).
Harbor Insurance v. Industrial Commission 621 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Pascucci v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Crocker v. Industrial Commission 606 P.2d 417 Ariz. 1980
Baca v. Smith 604 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1979
Baca v. Smith 604 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1979
Andy Baumert v. Municipal Court of the City of Phoenix, et al., , , to this effect: “Q. Mr. Haag, you were speaking about the possibility of a crimped sample deteriorating through various means, when you were on cross-examination, do you recall?