Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Taylor, 407 P.2d 59.

36 citing documents.

State v. Hon labianca/pedro 520 P.3d 1196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hon labianca/pedro 520 P.3d 1196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
own advantage and then invoke the privilege and claim the right to be free from cross-examination.” Montoya, 173 Ariz. at 131 (citing Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 155-56 (1958), ).
State v. Schackart 858 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1993
State v. Schackart 858 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1993
Montoya v. Superior Court 840 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Montoya v. Superior Court 840 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
622, 627 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958); , State ex rel.
State v. De La Ossa 623 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. De La Ossa 623 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Coleman 593 P.2d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Coleman 593 P.2d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Godinez 531 P.2d 154 Ariz. 1975
State v. Godinez 531 P.2d 154 Ariz. 1975
State v. Jones 509 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1973
State v. Jones 509 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1973
State v. McCurdy 487 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. McCurdy 487 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Peterson 485 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1971
State v. Peterson 485 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1971
In Arizona we have held, , : “ * * * the defendant, by testifying, waives his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and must answer all relevant questions even though they may tend to convict him of the crime for which he is on trial.” We are still of the opinion that a defendant who takes the stand wai
State v. Verrue 471 P.2d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Verrue 471 P.2d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Frand 453 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1969
State v. Frand 453 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1969
“We have repeatedly held that matters which were not raised in the lower court will not be considered as grounds for reversal in this Court.” , ; , , cert.
State v. Roche 451 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1969
State v. Roche 451 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1969
State v. Zappia 448 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Zappia 448 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
1 Our Supreme Court has adopted the view that the accused, by taking the stand, opens himself up to “ * * * legitimate cross-examination * * , cert.
State v. Washington 447 P.2d 863 Ariz. 1968
State v. Washington 447 P.2d 863 Ariz. 1968
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of Cochise 438 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of Cochise 438 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958); , 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2275 (McNaughton Revision 1961).
State v. Skinner 422 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Skinner 422 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Seymour 421 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1966
State v. Seymour 421 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1966