Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sims, 409 P.2d 17.
- State v. Villegas 420 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Villegas 420 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Wise 419 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Wise 419 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Tuggle 418 P.2d 372 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. Tuggle
418 P.2d 372
Ariz. 1966
On an appeal from an order made after judgment, it may set aside, affirm or modify the order or any proceeding subsequent to or dependent upon such order.” [Emphasis added] , , that this section of the Code gives this court broad power to make any order which is consistent with justice and the rights of the state.
- State v. Valenzuela 418 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Valenzuela 418 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Sexton 417 P.2d 554 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
- State v. Sexton 417 P.2d 554 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
- State v. Ballesteros 413 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. Ballesteros
413 P.2d 739
Ariz. 1966
However damaging these circumstances may have been to the witness Lugo’s credibility, still, “we have repeatedly held that the test to determine whether a witness is an accomplice is whether the witness could be informed against for the same crime which the defendant stands accused.” 306 , .
- State v. Schroeder 409 P.2d 725 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. Schroeder
409 P.2d 725
Ariz. 1966
In State v. Sims, 99 Ariz. *23 302, (Dec.