Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Blankenship, 406 P.2d 729.
- State v. Davis 449 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Davis 449 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Ganster 433 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Ganster 433 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Marlin 428 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
State v. Marlin
428 P.2d 699
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict and judgment as we must, , the following facts are pertinent to this matter on appeal.
- State v. Wright 427 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- State v. Wright 427 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- State v. Perry 426 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
State v. Perry
426 P.2d 415
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
This is sufficient, and the contention of the appellants that there was no showing of infliction of serious bodily injury or a showing that means were used calculated to inflict great bodily injury, is unfounded.”
- State v. Horn 422 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
State v. Horn
422 P.2d 172
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
State v. Shepard, 1 Ariz.App.