Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Maynard, 418 P.2d 576.
- State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Brown 898 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1995
- State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Brown 898 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Paruszewski 466 P.2d 787 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Paruszewski 466 P.2d 787 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Johns 460 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Johns
460 P.2d 177
Ariz. 1969
State v. Beers, 8 Ariz.App.
- State v. Moore 456 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Moore
456 P.2d 915
Ariz. 1969
Nor does it conform to the rule of the law provided in State v. Tigue, supra, , .
- State v. Curtis 455 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Curtis 455 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Miller 452 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Miller 452 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Beers 448 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- State v. Beers 448 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- State v. Stotts 446 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- State v. Stotts 446 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- State v. Michael 436 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1968
-
State v. Michael
436 P.2d 595
Ariz. 1968
Nor does it conform to the rule of the law provided in State v. Tigue, supra, , .
- State v. Woody 435 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
-
State v. Wood
435 P.2d 857
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
that it is not fundamental error to fail to give the limiting instruction on circumstantial evidence in a case in which the prosecution did not rely exclusively upon circumstantial evidence for conviction.
-
Distinguished
State v. Woody
435 P.2d 861
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
holding that “admissions” are direct evidence rather than circumstantial evidence, in that the admissions referred to in Maynard were admissions going directly to elements of the offense charged.
- State v. Bradley 433 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Bradley 433 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Valenzuela 425 P.2d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
-
State v. Valenzuela
425 P.2d 127
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
states that conversations and admissions of an accused are direct evidence rather than circumstantial evidence.