Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC., 618 P.2d 1078.
- State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Taylor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Phoenix City Prosecutor’s ¶ 6, 4 STATE v. TAYLOR Decision of the Court (App. 2006) (holding that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial for a charge of misdemeanor assault); (stating that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial on a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge).
- Abuhl v. Howell 135 P.3d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
- Abuhl v. Howell 135 P.3d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
- Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
-
Derendal v. Griffith
104 P.3d 147
Ariz. 2005
-55, -81 (1980) (noting that “[i]t is the law, federal and state, that a possible penalty of a 6-month jail sentence is not so severe as to require trial by jury” and finding a $1,000 fine not serious enough to require a jury trial) (citing Muniz v. Hoff
- Benitez v. Dunevant 7 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2000
-
Benitez v. Dunevant
7 P.3d 99
Ariz. 2000
(maximum six-month sentence and $1000 fine in 1980 did not establish severe penalty for disorderly conduct); , (liquor license suspension for selling liquor to minor not jury eligible where the penalty wa
- Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- Amancio v. Forster 993 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
Amancio v. Forster
993 P.2d 1059
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
the defendant was charged with disorderly conduct, a class 1 misdemeanor subject *97 to a maximum penalty of six months’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.
- State v. Superior Court 944 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- State v. Superior Court 944 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- State v. Miller 836 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- State v. Miller 836 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
- Mungarro v. Riley 826 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- Mungarro v. Riley 826 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- State v. Harrison 792 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Harrison 792 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Matter of Marquardt 778 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1989
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny 778 P.2d 1193 Ariz. 1989
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny 778 P.2d 1193 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. City Court of Tucson 760 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State v. City Court of Tucson 760 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson 687 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson 687 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Moreno 655 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Moreno 655 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Spitz v. Municipal Court of City of Phoenix 621 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1980
- Spitz v. Municipal Court of City of Phoenix 621 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1980