Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Cooper v. Cooper, 635 P.2d 850.
- Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Stewart v. Stewart
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Although the mere fact of commingling is insufficient to transmute the entire account to community property, “the burden is upon the person claiming that the commingled funds, or any portion of them, are separate to prove that fact and the amount by clear and satisfactory evidence.” -60, -53 (1981) (citation omitted).
- Marriage of Roden v. Roden 949 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Marriage of Roden v. Roden 949 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Bianco v. Patterson 768 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Bianco v. Patterson 768 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Rowe v. Rowe 744 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Rowe v. Rowe
744 P.2d 717
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
to day transactions from the date of marriage to the date of incorporation.” Patricia Rowe argues that it was therefore error for the court to conclude that although, as of the date of incorporation, JRA’s assets “were in unsegregated part the product of husband’s post-maritál management and labor, those assets were not community property.” , : unless one can explicitly trace his or her separate property, commingled community and separate funds will be presumed community property.
- City of Phoenix v. Bellamy 736 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- City of Phoenix v. Bellamy 736 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 694 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 694 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Marriage of Deatherage v. Deatherage 681 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Marriage of Deatherage v. Deatherage 681 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984