Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Portonova v. Wilkinson, 627 P.2d 232.

84 citing documents.

Ancell v. Union Station Associates, Inc. 803 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Ancell v. Union Station Associates, Inc. 803 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
When uncontroverted, “facts alleged by affidavits attached to motions for summary judgment may be considered as true____”
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Northern Contracting Company, 117 Ariz. at 377 , 573 P.2d at 68
Chamberlain v. Mathis 729 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1986
Chamberlain v. Mathis 729 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1986
E.g., Green Acres, 141 Ariz. at 613 , 688 P.2d at 621 (absolute immunity from defamation action for statements made in connection with judicial proceedings); , (qualified immunity for police officer accused of defamation); Grimm, 115 Ariz. at 265 , 564 P.2d at 1232 (qualified immunity for board of pardons and paroles); see also A.R.S.
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Huff v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co. 702 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Huff v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co. 702 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
As Town & Country has itself pointed out, Rule 56(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, requires that affidavits supporting or opposing summary judgment “shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.”
Green Acres Trust v. London 688 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1984
Green Acres Trust v. London 688 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1984
Schroeder v. Hudgins 690 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Schroeder v. Hudgins 690 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Carlson v. Pima County 687 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1984
Carlson v. Pima County 687 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1984
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani 697 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani 697 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Carlson v. Pima County 687 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Carlson v. Pima County 687 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
The appellant’s , is misplaced.
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Sabel 674 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Sabel 674 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Ickes v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. 650 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Ickes v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. 650 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
MacConnell v. Mitten 638 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1981
MacConnell v. Mitten 638 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1981