Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hughes, 426 P.2d 386.

86 citing documents.

State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
At the trial court level
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
and its predecessor, , meant, and it is hard to say, once Arizona adopted its Rules of Evidence, all prior evidentiary decisions in conflict with those rules were superseded.
State v. Pereida 825 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Pereida 825 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Appellant also argues that the evidence was inadmissible because the proof was insufficient to take to the jury
State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1982
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1982
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
This evidence is generally excluded because it tends to draw the jury’s attention from the real issues on trial and to lead them unconsciously to render their verdicts in accordance with their view of defendant as a “bad man.”
State v. Woods 589 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1979
State v. Woods 589 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1979
State Ex Rel. LaSota v. Corcoran 583 P.2d 229 Ariz. 1978
State Ex Rel. LaSota v. Corcoran 583 P.2d 229 Ariz. 1978
It is only necessary that, “the proof both as to the commission of another crime and its commission by the defendant, must be by ‘substantial evidence sufficient to take the case to a jury’.”
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Miller 564 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Miller 564 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Marahrens 560 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1977
State v. Marahrens 560 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1977
State v. Celaya 556 P.2d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Celaya 556 P.2d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Babineaux, 22 Ariz.App.
State v. Mitchell 545 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1976
State v. Mitchell 545 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1976
where the identity of the defendant is the question in issue, any fact which tends to establish the identity has probative value and if offered for that purpose it is receivable.” The quantum of proof needed to establish that the accused on trial committed the separate offense sought to be introduced is that of “substantial evidence sufficient to take the case to a jury.”
State v. Lee 542 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Lee 542 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Appellant claimed that in order to admit proof of another crime the evidence of the crime and its commission by appellant must be established by “substantial evidence sufficient to take the case to the jury.” Assuming that this is the test to be applied ( , ), this standard is met in the current case.
State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
tends to draw the attention of the jury away from a consideration of the real issues on trial, to fasten it upon other questions, and to lead them unconsciously to render their verdicts in accordance with their views on false issues rather than on the true issues on trial.”
State v. Keith 537 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Keith 537 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
1 , our Supreme Court stated: “.
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
appeal dismissed and cert.
State v. Green 518 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1974
State v. Green 518 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1974
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 851 Ariz. 1973
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 851 Ariz. 1973