Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ., 631 P.2d 1087.

48 citing documents.

transact/imdemnity v. Beierle II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
transact/imdemnity v. Beierle II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Boyd v. Duraserv Corp dba/liberty Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Boyd v. Duraserv Corp dba/liberty Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
Landon v. Industrial Commission 375 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Landon v. Industrial Commission 375 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattly v. brown/focus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattly v. brown/focus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, (even a lack of findings on material issues does not necessarily invalidate an award with a legally sound basis).
Todorovic v. hilton/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Todorovic v. hilton/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Munoz v. fry's/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Munoz v. fry's/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Calder v. interstate/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Calder v. interstate/zurich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 249 P.3d 1095 Ariz. 2011
Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 249 P.3d 1095 Ariz. 2011
Comm’n, , (“The AMA Guides apply only where they cover the specific impairment and where the percentage of impairment contained therein truly reflects the claimant’s loss.”); Smith v. Indus.
Sun Valley Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 167 P.3d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sun Valley Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 167 P.3d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Consumers Council v. Arizona Corp. Commission 22 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arizona Consumers Council v. Arizona Corp. Commission 22 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
v. Industrial Comm’n of Arizona, , (Industrial Commission need not set forth separate findings that lead to determination of ultimate fact so long as ultimate finding is supported by the record).
Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 975 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 975 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
See also Cavco Industries v. Industrial Comm’n, , Adams v. Industrial Comm’n, , Cassey .
Hanley v. Industrial Commission 767 P.2d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 770 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1989
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 770 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1989
Hanley v. Industrial Commission 767 P.2d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Burnett v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 764 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Burnett v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 764 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
[for the administrative law judge’s] conclusion was legally sound.” Cavco Industries v. Industrial Comm’n
Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
the supreme court did not require a specific finding as to how the ultimate fact was reached (i.e., that the respondent employee had suffered a permanent impairment) because it could be determined from an examination of the record.
W.A. Krueger Co. v. Industrial Commission 722 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
W.A. Krueger Co. v. Industrial Commission 722 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
(Guides do not cover impairment from degenerative changes and loss of strength); 3 , *173 (1976) (Guides do not cover subjective complaints of pain); 4 , (Guides do
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Garcia v. Industrial Commission, 26 Ariz.App.
Shockey v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 680 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Shockey v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 680 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Cavco Industries v. Industrial Comm’n, , Tucson Elec.
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Industrial Commission 676 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Industrial Commission 676 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Commission, et al.
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-949 657 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-949 657 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
CAVCO Industries v. Ind’l Com’n of Arizona
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Commission 652 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Commission 652 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982