Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mid-Century Insurance v. Duzykowski, 641 P.2d 1272.

38 citing documents.

Mendota Insurance v. Gallegos 302 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Mendota Insurance v. Gallegos 302 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(whether child was “resident of the same household” for coverage inclusion was question of fact); State Farm Mut.
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lisa Ridgely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lisa Ridgely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(“Factors to consider in determining whether an individual is a ‘resident of the same household’ include, but are not limited to, the individual’s presence in, or absence from, the named insured’s home on the date of the occurrence; the reasons or circumstances relating to the abse
Margaret H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 148 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Margaret H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 148 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
(if party’s state of mind or intent is a material issue, summary judgment “normally” improper); Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmel, M.D., Ltd., (same).
Thomas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 842 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Thomas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 842 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rodemich v. State Farm Mut.
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Novak 807 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Novak 807 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 787 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Murray v. Zerbel 764 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Murray v. Zerbel 764 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
The case cited by Murray, , is not applicable because only subjective intent was involved.
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
1 A. WIDISS, supra § 4.7, at 67-68.
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
(“resident of the same household”); Heard v. Farmers Ins.
Cohen v. Salt River Project 736 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Cohen v. Salt River Project 736 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Monares v. Wilcoxson 736 P.2d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Monares v. Wilcoxson 736 P.2d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 724 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1986
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 724 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1986
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Johnson 729 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Johnson 729 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
the Arizona Supreme Court listed various factors to consider in determining whether an individual is a “resident of the same household”: [T]he individual’s presence in, or absence from, the named insured’s home on the date of the occurrence; the reasons or circumstances relating to the absence
Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd. 716 P.2d 1013 Ariz. 1986
Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd. 716 P.2d 1013 Ariz. 1986
Madsen Ex Rel. Corbin v. Western American Mortgage Co. 694 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Madsen Ex Rel. Corbin v. Western American Mortgage Co. 694 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985