Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., 639 P.2d 321.

53 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Margain and Ruiz-Bours 372 P.3d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re the Marriage of Margain and Ruiz-Bours 372 P.3d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
unless the party from whom fees or expenses are sought establishes that the award is clearly inappropriate.” Who is the prevailing party “is never certain until the appeal process is concluded.” Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Jewels v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jewels v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 12-341.01(A) in Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., P.2d 321 (1982).
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 111 P.3d 1019 Ariz. 2005
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 111 P.3d 1019 Ariz. 2005
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Mason v. Cansino 990 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Mason v. Cansino 990 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
§ 12-341.01; Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , (statute authorizing award of attorneys’ fees in a contract action applies to appeals as well as trials).
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 830 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 830 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Cross v. Office of the Attorney General 795 P.2d 1297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Cross v. Office of the Attorney General 795 P.2d 1297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Relying on Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , the state asserts that “the party that is successful in an action can recover attorney’s fees incurred in litigating the matter, not merely in the forum of the trial court, but in other forums in which that party was compelled to appear in order to prevail.” The state also maintains that, by cho
Koenen v. Royal Buick Co. 783 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Koenen v. Royal Buick Co. 783 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Bartning v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 783 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1989
Bartning v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 783 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1989
See Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Schade v. Diethrich 760 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1988
Schade v. Diethrich 760 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1988
“Who is the ‘successful party’ is never certain until the appeal process is concluded.” Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
See, e.g., Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , , (both dealing with the attempt to recover attorney’s fees for breach of bailment contract implied in fact); , (declining to apply contract statute of limitat
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
§ 12-341.01; Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 682 Ariz. 1986
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 682 Ariz. 1986
Regardless of the form of the pleadings, this court will look to the nature of the action and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether the claim is one “arising out of a contract.” Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
McCollum v. Continental Casualty Co. 728 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
McCollum v. Continental Casualty Co. 728 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
§ 12-341.01; Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , 639 P.2d *496 321 (1982).
United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc. 716 P.2d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc. 716 P.2d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 710 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1985
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Co., , Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Company
Mariposa Development Co. v. Stoddard 711 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Mariposa Development Co. v. Stoddard 711 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
§ 12-341.01(A), Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , and since we conclude that it is appropriate to award attorney’s fees on appeal pursuant to A.R.S.
Whittemore v. Amator 713 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Whittemore v. Amator 713 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , the Arizona Supreme Court determined that A.R.S.
Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc. 688 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc. 688 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Wean Water, Inc. v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. 686 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Wean Water, Inc. v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. 686 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Auman v. Auman 653 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1982
Auman v. Auman 653 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1982
Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co.
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982