Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation, 637 P.2d 1053.

193 citing documents.

Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found., , (statute that gave preference for horse racing permit to past permittees was rationally related to encouraging investment into horse racing business by assuring continuity and predictability of events).
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Arizona Public Service Co. 934 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Downs v. Arizona *243 Horsemen’s Foundation
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Arizona Public Service Co. 934 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 930 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1997
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 930 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1997
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, -57 , -60 (1981)
City of Glendale v. Aldabbagh 928 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
City of Glendale v. Aldabbagh 928 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
CONSTITUTIONAL RAMIFICATIONS OF AN ABSOLUTE TIME-BAR Where possible, this court has a duty to interpret a statute or ordinance in a manner “which will render it constitutional.” Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
Lerma v. Keck 921 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lerma v. Keck 921 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Purcell 927 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Purcell 927 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation
Kahn v. Thompson 916 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Kahn v. Thompson 916 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
See Arizona Downs v. Ariz. Horsemen’s Foundation, , (construing racing commission’s statutory mandate to recognize permittee agreements as “directory” when not in the public interest or convenience).
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation
Aitken v. Industrial Commission 904 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1995
Aitken v. Industrial Commission 904 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1995
Consistent with our “duty to construe a statute so as to give it, if possible, a reasonable and constitutional meaning,” Arizona Downs v. Ariz. Horsemen’s Found., , we must make every effort to harmonize these legislative acts.
Watahomigie v. BD. OF WATER QUALITY APP. 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Watahomigie v. BD. OF WATER QUALITY APP. 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Roosevelt Elementary School District Number 66 v. Bishop 877 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Watahomigie v. Arizona Board of Water Quality Appeals 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found., , *273 554, , 1057 (1981); Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court, 1993 WL 537923 , 155 Ariz.Adv.Rep.
Watahomigie v. Arizona Board of Water Quality Appeals 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
A law is special and, therefore, unconstitutional if it “applies only to certain members of a class or to an arbitrarily defined class which is not rationally related to a legitimate legislative purpose.” Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found., , (citing Prescott Courier, , 274 P. 163 (1929)).
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, , Carr, 758 F.Supp.
Tucson Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Tucson 837 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Tucson Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Tucson 837 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found., -56 , -59 (1981).
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, , , approved in pertinent part
Smith v. Superior Court 831 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Smith v. Superior Court 831 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See id.; Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horseman’s Foundation
Hampton v. Glendale Union High School District 837 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hampton v. Glendale Union High School District 837 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
Tucson Unified School District v. Chicago Title Insurance 804 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Tucson Unified School District v. Chicago Title Insurance 804 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Citing Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, , appellees argued below that conduct which might normally be a violation of antitrust statutes is, nevertheless, permissible if specifically authorized by other statutes.
Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners v. Fleischman 806 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners v. Fleischman 806 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation
Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise 800 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1990
Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise 800 P.2d 1251 Ariz. 1990
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, , (emphasis in original).
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals 789 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1990
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals 789 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1990
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Found.
State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989