Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gladden Farms, Inc. v. State, 633 P.2d 325.

41 citing documents.

Pierce v. Ducey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Pierce v. Ducey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Tempe v. Sussex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Tempe v. Sussex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gladden Farms, Arizona-New Mexico Enabling Act §§ 24, 25 (1910) (the “Enabling Act”).
Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera 282 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2012
Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera 282 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2012
See Gladden Farms, (noting that the Enabling Act is one of Arizona’s fundamental laws and preempts conflicting state statutes).
Rumery v. Baier 268 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Rumery v. Baier 268 P.3d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 13 While “[t]he Enabling Act is one of the fundamental laws of the State of Arizona and is superior to the Constitution of the State of Arizona,” Gladden Farms, , our constitution “may establish even more stringent ...
Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department 212 P.3d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department 212 P.3d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Guardians v. Wells 34 P.3d 364 Ariz. 2001
Forest Guardians v. Wells 4 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Forest Guardians v. Wells 4 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Gladden Farms, , ( P.2d 336 (1947)).
Princess Plaza Partners v. State 928 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Princess Plaza Partners v. State 928 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Campana v. Arizona State Land Department 860 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Campana v. Arizona State Land Department 860 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Martori v. Arizona State Land Department 861 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Martori v. Arizona State Land Department 861 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
No. 97 v. Superior Court, , (eminent domain proceeding against school trust property violates Arizona Constitution); Gladden Farms, , (transfer at appraised value to another state agency violated Enabling Act and Arizona Constitution); Farmers Invest.
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
See Deer Valley, 157 Ariz. at 539 , 760 P.2d at 539 ; Kadish, 155 Ariz. at 487 , 747 P.2d at 1185 ; Glad *590 den Farms
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land Department 764 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land Department 764 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct. 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct. 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 747 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1987
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 747 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1987
Seven Springs Ranch, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Water Resources 753 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Seven Springs Ranch, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Water Resources 753 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Cracchiolo v. State 706 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cracchiolo v. State 706 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
A third case decided by the supreme court at the same time is Gladden Farms
Cracchiolo v. State 660 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Cracchiolo v. State 660 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
v. Superior Court, Etc., , , And see Gladden Farms
City of Sierra Vista v. Babbitt 633 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1981
Arizona State Land Dept. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 633 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1981
City of Sierra Vista v. Babbitt 633 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1981
See Gladden Farms, , No. 15374, , No. 15320, both filed this day.
Arizona State Land Dept. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 633 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1981
We granted this petition for special action pursuant to Art. 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S., along with Gladden Farms, , No. 15374, , No. 15360, filed this day, because the question raised is one of state-wide importance and there is no equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.