Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, 638 P.2d 692.

50 citing documents.

Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
Action No. JD-561, –28 (1981).
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Action No. JD-561, –28 (1981) (“The state has a vital interest in the status of the parent-child relationship and, because of the importance of this interest, the state may intrude into the parent-child relationship to protect the welfare of the child and the state’s own interest in the welfare of its citizens.”).
Chongtanalertporn v. Brocato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Chongtanalertporn v. Brocato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JD-561, (citing Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc.
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JD-561, -28 (1981); see also Ruben M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Victor B., Elizabeth B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Victor B., Elizabeth B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JD-561, ("Implicit in this right of proper parental care are the rights to good physical care and emotional security.") (citation omitted).
Shah v. Az Brd Dental Exam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shah v. Az Brd Dental Exam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juvenile Action JD-561, ); see also Carlson, 214 Ariz. at 430–31, ¶ 15, 153 P.3d at 1059–60 (noting the flexible nature of due process does not require elaborate administrative hearings as long as there is notice and opportunity to be heard).
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) and Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , but without addressing the best interests of the children, the ruling noted that maintaining Parents’ “due process rights in a termination proceeding is superior to the interests of the state.” Accordingly, the ruling concludes that precluding Parents from calling the children as witnesses would
Carolina H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 307 P.3d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Carolina H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 307 P.3d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Action No. JD-561, and “parental guidance and 11 control,” In re Maricopa County Juv.
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Action No. JD-561, (“adversary process is subverted and made meaningless” without opportunity to test reliability of witnesses through cross-examination); Monica C., ¶¶ 26-27, 118 P.3d at 43 (termination hearing sufficient when it included representation by counsel, cross-examination, and
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Leonardo 22 P.3d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Leonardo 22 P.3d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
See In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561
Berenter v. Gallinger 839 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Berenter v. Gallinger 839 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
In Re Maricopa County Juvenile Action JD-561
In re the Appeal in Santa Cruz County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. JD-89-006 & JD-89-007 804 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In re the Appeal in Santa Cruz County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. JD-89-006 & JD-89-007 804 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
See Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
This unfortunate choice of language misstates our supreme court’s holding in Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , (hereinafter “JD-561 ”).
In Re the Marriage of Herreras 768 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In Re the Marriage of Herreras 768 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Matter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2248 767 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2248 767 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6520 756 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6520 756 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Juvenile Appeal JD-561, -28 , -95 (1981).
Large v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1986
Large v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1986
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561
State v. Grooms 702 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Grooms 702 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
And see In Re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , holding that a parent’s interest in the custody and control of his/her children is protected and may not be changed without due process and strict compliance with applicable statutes.
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Hovatter 698 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Hovatter 698 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See also Maricopa County Juvenile Action JD-561
In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963 692 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963 692 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cf. Matter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , (state may intrude into parent-child relationship to protect welfare of child).
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-77188 678 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-77188 678 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
See Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , Matter of the Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action No. J-3824
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
Mat *294 ter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561, , In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J — 75482
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374 667 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374 667 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In the Matter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561