Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Barassi v. Matison, 636 P.2d 1200.

122 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ramon Limon 270 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
6 but merely note it was filed before the trial court’s order dismissing the action.
Craig v. Craig 253 P.3d 624 Ariz. 2011
Craig v. Craig 253 P.3d 624 Ariz. 2011
orney for Roger Thomas Craig ________________________________________________________________ H U R W I T Z, Vice Chief Justice ¶1 We stated thirty years ago that appellate courts should “dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the case where a litigant attempts to appeal where a motion is still pending in the trial court.”
Short v. Dewald 244 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Short v. Dewald 244 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
*92 -22 , -04 (1981) (premature appeal need not be dismissed when court subsequently enters final judgment).
Craig v. Craig 240 P.3d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Craig v. Craig 240 P.3d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
419-22, , 1201-04 (1981).
AKSAMIT v. Krahn 227 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
AKSAMIT v. Krahn 227 P.3d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 225 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 225 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
117— 18, -39 (App.1997) (-22 , -04 (1981)).
Tripati v. FORWITH 219 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tripati v. FORWITH 219 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 11 , (noting premature notice of appeal should not be dismissed when “only ministerial tasks remained to accomplish the entry of a final judgment”).
Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Father’s Premature Appeal ¶ 11 -20 , -02 (1981), the supreme court held that a notice of appeal filed after the denial of a motion for new trial but before the entry of final judgment was sufficient to secure appellate jurisdiction.
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See ARCAP 9(b) (“[e]ntry of an order occurs when a signed written order is filed with the clerk of the superior court.”); , 92 n. 3, ¶ 6, , 610 n. 3 (2006); , Eaton Fruit Co. v. Cal.
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Klebba v. Carpenter 139 P.3d 609 Ariz. 2006
Klebba v. Carpenter 139 P.3d 609 Ariz. 2006
See Barassi v. Matison, 130 Ariz. 418, 420-21, -03 (1981).
Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission 132 P.3d 1187 Ariz. 2006
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Jackson 113 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Jackson 113 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
("[A] premature appeal from a minute entry order in which no appellee was prejudiced and in which a subsequent final judgment was entered over which jurisdiction may be exercised need not be dismissed.").
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Schwab v. Ames Const. 83 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Schwab v. Ames Const. 83 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Comeau v. Ariz. State Bd.
Mezey v. Fioramonti 65 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Mezey v. Fioramonti 65 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Nielson v. Patterson 65 P.3d 911 Ariz. 2003
Decola v. Freyer 6 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Decola v. Freyer 6 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Performance Funding, LLC v. Barcon Corp. 3 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Performance Funding, LLC v. Barcon Corp. 3 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Counterman 992 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Counterman 992 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Joe P. Guinn & State Farm v. Schweitzer 945 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Joe P. Guinn & State Farm v. Schweitzer 945 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hill v. Maricopa County 950 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hill v. Maricopa County 950 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See Barassi v. Matison, *560 , (holding a notice of appeal from a minute entry followed by a subsequent final judgment conferred jurisdiction on the appellate court); , (holding a notice of appeal from a minute entry order dismissing fewer than all claims was sufficient to pe
Mayer v. State 908 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mayer v. State 908 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Though the Arizona rule is worded differently to permit premature appeals, , both rules refer to the same deadline for filing at issue here.
Baumann v. Tuton 884 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by