Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court, 641 P.2d 1275.

162 citing documents.

State v. Martin 847 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Helffrich 846 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Helffrich 846 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Wilson v. Industrial Comm’n of Ariz.
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
State v. Wagstaff 794 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1990
Knapp v. Miller 799 P.2d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Knapp v. Miller 799 P.2d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc.
Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc. 801 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
(citing Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 , 92 S.Ct.
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Martinez v. WORKMAN'S COMP. INS. FUND 788 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Martinez v. WORKMAN'S COMP. INS. FUND 788 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
see also Olivas v. United States, 506 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir.1974).
Elgin v. Great-West Life Assurance Co. 786 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Elgin v. Great-West Life Assurance Co. 786 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
in which the Arizona Supreme Court adopted and applied the Chevron Oil test.
Schroeder v. Schroeder 778 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1989
Schroeder v. Schroeder 778 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1989
Our holding is consistent with the presumption that, unless otherwise stated, a court opinion operates retroactively as well as prospectively, -36 , -80 (1982).
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
‘We will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless we are satisfied *357 beyond a reasonable doubt that the act is in conflict with the federal or state constitutions.’
Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board 766 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board 766 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
We also believe this view to be embodied in the frequent announcements, most recently in the supplemental Law decision, that “[UJnless otherwise specified, *265 Arizona appellate opinions in civil cases operate both retroactively and prospectively.” Id., 157 Ariz. at 160 , 755 P.2d at 1148 (emphasis added); , Hollywood Continental Films v. Indus.
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
we upheld the constitutionality of the 1981 amendment to A.R.S.
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1088 Ariz. 1987
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1088 Ariz. 1987
(citing Olivas v. United States, 506 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir.1974)); see also Liberty Mutual Ins.
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Grim v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 740 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Grim v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 740 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance 733 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1987
Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance 733 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
“We will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the act is in conflict with the federal or state constitutions.”
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Lynn v. Helitec Corp. 698 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Lynn v. Helitec Corp. 698 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
our supreme court addressed an issue similar to the one sub judice.
Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
accord Annot., 10 A.L.R.3d 1371 (1966).
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Litchfield Elementary School Dist.