Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial Commission, 641 P.2d 848.

24 citing documents.

Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc. 258 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc. 258 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Comm’n, , ); accord Grammati-co v. Indus.
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Comm’n (Senor T’s II), , 365 n. 2, , 853 n. 2 (1982).
Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1999
Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1999
See Senor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n
Francis v. Arizona Department of Transportation 963 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Francis v. Arizona Department of Transportation 963 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
See Senor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n, , (Froeb, J., concurring), vacated on other grounds
Lazarus v. Industrial Commission 947 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Lazarus v. Industrial Commission 947 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
“[T]he emphasis in setting a worker’s average monthly wage is on what the employee has actually earned for his labors.” Senor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n
Mail Boxes v. Industrial Commission 888 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1995
Mail Boxes v. Industrial Commission 888 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1995
Senor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n
State v. Dawson 858 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1993
State v. Dawson 858 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1993
Senor T’s , (legislation is construed to be constitutional whenever possible).
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
at 499-500, 506-08 , 494 P.2d at 399-400 , 406- *99 08 (combining wages of claimant who worked as a full-time plasterer and part-time plasterer for two different employers); cf. Señor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n, -65 , -53 (1982) (combining tips received by cocktail waitress and bartender with wages from employer in determining average monthly wage); Scott v. Industrial Comm’n, -73 , -23 (Ct.App.1978) (combining tips received by taxicab driver with wages from employer in
State v. Ellison 819 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Criticized State v. Ellison 819 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Se nor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n, , 365-66 n. 2, , 853-54 n. 2 (1982).
Snow v. Snow 745 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 739 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 739 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See generally, e.g., Senor T’s Restaurant v. Industrial Comm’n
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985