Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Bliss v. Treece, 658 P.2d 169.
- Dunham v. Pima County 778 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1989
-
Dunham v. Pima County
778 P.2d 1200
Ariz. 1989
704; , M. Udall & J. Livermore, Law of Evidence § 26 (2d.
- Desmond v. Superior Court 779 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1989
- Desmond v. Superior Court 779 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1989
- Kott v. City of Phoenix 763 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1988
-
Distinguished
Kott v. City of Phoenix
763 P.2d 235
Ariz. 1988
relied upon by defendant, is easily distinguishable.
- Baroldy v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. 760 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Baroldy v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. 760 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- State v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 732 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- State v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 732 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- State v. Crum 722 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
State v. Crum
722 P.2d 971
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
” PROSECUTOR’S CLOSING ARGUMENT Finally, appellant contends that the prosecutor argued facts not in evidence concerning the pornographic magazines.
- State v. Kerr 690 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Kerr 690 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984