Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Veatch, 646 P.2d 279.

58 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
We first review the jury’s finding of aggravating circumstances, and “we uphold a decision if there is ‘any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.’” (Cory D.) Morris, 215 Ariz. at 340–41 ¶ 77 ().
Ronnie McDaniel v. Payson Healthcare Ariz. 2022
Ronnie McDaniel v. Payson Healthcare Ariz. 2022
We review the trial court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion, Bowen Prods., ¶ 9 (App. 2013), and will uphold it if there is “any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it,” ¶ 77 (2007) ().
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
A finding of aggravating circumstances or the imposition of a death sentence is not an abuse of discretion if there is “any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.” Morris, 215 Ariz. at 341 ¶ 77 ().
State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We review the admission of other act evidence for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 10 (App. 2013), and will uphold a decision if there is “any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.” ¶ 77 (2007) ().
Hiskett v. Hon. lambert/state 451 P.3d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hiskett v. Hon. lambert/state 451 P.3d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
i. Aggravating circumstances ¶193 We will uphold the jury’s findings of aggravating circumstances “if there is ‘any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.’” Morris, 215 Ariz. at 341 ¶ 77 ().
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
OF ARIZONA the amount entered above....” See, ¶ 10 (Okla.2000) (“By the written undertaking, the bondsman (surety) agrees to insure the appearance of the defendant (principal) before the court and, in the event the defendant fails to appear, to pay to the court (creditor) the amount of money specified in the order fixing bail.”); , (referring to language “of a bail-bond contract”); State ex rel.
State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston Butler 286 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston Butler 286 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Under an abuse of discretion standard of review, “we uphold a decision if there is ‘any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.’”
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
at 341 ¶ 77, 160 P.3d at 220 ( ).
State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
Under this standard of review, we uphold a decision if there is “any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.”
In re Edgar V. 158 P.3d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re Edgar V. 158 P.3d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Dale Meinhardt Ariz. 2003
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Dale Meinhardt Ariz. 2003
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
See, e.g., *472 , Rogers, 117 Ariz. at 260 , 571 P.2d at 1056 .
State v. Bonds 33 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Bonds 33 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 924 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 924 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Killean 907 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287 828 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287 828 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Graber v. City of Peoria 753 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Graber v. City of Peoria 753 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action B-10489 727 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action B-10489 727 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing 709 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing 709 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Viliborghi, 55 Ariz. at 231 , 100 P.2d at 179