Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933, 660 P.2d 1205.

44 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez 548 P.3d 1102 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez 548 P.3d 1102 Ariz. 2024
Action No. S-933, (avoiding a potential constitutional issue by adopting A.R.S.
Jessica S. v. Dcs, A.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessica S. v. Dcs, A.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
le court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and 4 Mother notes that in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933, our supreme court defined a final order, for the purposes of ruling on a petition for termination of parental rights, as an order “which ends the proceedings, leaving no question open for further judicial action.”
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. S-933, (“The failure to file an appeal in a timely fashion deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction.”).
Jessicah C. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessicah C. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. S-933, (stating, in reinstating an appeal from an order granting severance, “[a] final order is one which ends the proceedings, leaving no question open for further judicial action”).
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. S-933, (“The right to appeal exists only from a final order.”).
In re Javier B. 280 P.3d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In re Javier B. 280 P.3d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Jared P. v. Glade T. 209 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Jared P. v. Glade T. 209 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
“A final order is one which ends the proceedings, leaving no question open for further judicial action.” Pima County Juvenile Action S-933, , (citing Eaton v. Unified Sch.
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Action No. S-933, , Lone Mountain Ranch, Inc. v. Dillingham Inv., Inc.
Rita J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 1 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Rita J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 1 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
See In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Vallejo 979 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Vallejo 979 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-8441 838 P.2d 1278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-8441 838 P.2d 1278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In the Matter of the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Don 799 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Don 799 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Del E. Webb Communities, Inc. v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the County of Pima, , Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933, , County of Pima v. State Department of Revenue, Division of Property and Special Taxes
In Re the Marriage of Herreras 768 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In Re the Marriage of Herreras 768 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
A parent-child relationship has been recognized as “a personal right deserving of due process protection.” Matter of Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9365 759 P.2d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9365 759 P.2d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Contrary to appellant’s assertion that he has been unduly burdened by the rule in State v. Garza, our supreme court has since clarified the matter in In re Juvenile Action No. S-933, , holding that the requirements of A.R.S.
Theriault v. Scottsdale Enterprises 754 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Theriault v. Scottsdale Enterprises 754 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Cf. Appeal In Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
Security General Life Insurance v. Superior Court 718 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1986
Security General Life Insurance v. Superior Court 718 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1986
See Matter of Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-993, , A.R.S.
In re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607 708 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
In re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607 708 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933, , Hernandez v. State ex rel.
Davis v. Davis 691 P.2d 1082 Ariz. 1984
Davis v. Davis 691 P.2d 1082 Ariz. 1984
(motion to vacate filed 4V2 months after entry of judgment when required time is 30 days); , (notice of appeal filed 46 days after judgment, when required time is 15 days); Kiefer v. May, 22 Ariz.App.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-57445 691 P.2d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-57445 691 P.2d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
The Arizona Supreme Court has stated that a “final order” in a “termination” proceeding “is one which ends the proceedings, leaving no questions open for further judicial action.” In the Matter of the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
In Re the Appeal in Yuma County, Juvenile Action Nos. J-81-339 & J-81-340 682 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In Re the Appeal in Yuma County, Juvenile Action Nos. J-81-339 & J-81-340 682 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See In the Matter of the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile No. S-933, , Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. 2
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-8545 680 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1984
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-8545 680 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1984
In In re Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933, , we had to determine which of two orders (one stating the trial court’s finding that termination of parental rights was warranted; the second stating the findings which prompted that conclusion) was a final order before we could determine whether the Court of Appeals’ dismissal of petitioner’s ap
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
Matter of Appeal in Juvenile Action No. S-938, , also involved an issue of timely appeal under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by