Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite De Gryse v. De Gryse, 661 P.2d 185.

62 citing documents.

Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. 724 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. 724 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Perras v. Perras 726 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Perras v. Perras 726 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 693 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1984
Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 693 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1984
Davis v. Davis 691 P.2d 1082 Ariz. 1984
Distinguished Davis v. Davis 691 P.2d 1082 Ariz. 1984
(motion to vacate filed 4V2 months after entry of judgment when required time is 30 days); , (notice of appeal filed 46 days after judgment, when required time is 15 days); Kiefer v. May, 22 Ariz.App.
Craig v. Superior Court in and for Pima County 687 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Craig v. Superior Court in and for Pima County 687 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
: “The rule governing motions for relief from final judgments is primarily intended to allow relief from judgments that are unjust due to extraordinary circumstances that cannot be remedied by legal review.
Edsall v. Superior Court 693 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Edsall v. Superior Court 693 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984