Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Cited by
- Carranza v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. 2016
- Marriage of Flynn v. Rogers 834 P.2d 148 Ariz. 1992
- Marriage of Schmidt v. Schmidt 763 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. 1988
- Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 693 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1984
- Edsall v. Superior Court 693 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. 1984
- Todd v. Todd 670 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. 1983
- Bischofshausen v. Pinal-Gila Counties Air Quality Control District 673 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. 1983
- Richards v. Richards 669 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. 1983
- De Gryse v. De Gryse 661 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1983
- Portley v. Portley 657 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. 1982
- Budreau v. Budreau 658 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. 1982
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 649 P.2d 291
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. The appellee, Oscar Rodriguez, filed a Petition for Review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, holding that the ruling in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210 , 101 S.Ct. 2728 , 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981) does not apply retroactively to a divorce judgment which became final prior to the date of the McCarty decision. We accepted review. The original judgment in this case was entered in 1974. After the decision in the McCarty case, appellee, in August 1981, succeeded in having the superior court strike from the 1974 judgment the provision which awarded the appellant, his former wife, a share of his Air Force retirement benefits. The Court of Appeals vacated and set aside the 1981 order of the superior court. From our review of the legal authorities, we agree with the ruling of the Court of Appeals; therefore, we approve the decision of the Court of Appeals (Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 133 Ariz. 88 , 649 P.2d 291 (1982) and vacate and set aside the order of the superior court. HOLOHAN, C. J., GORDON, V. C. J., and HAYS, CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.