Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona, 659 P.2d 18.

26 citing documents.

Naslund v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 110 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Naslund v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 110 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
He petitioned in 1991 , 2 or a 1987 amendment to A.R.S.
Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 859 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 859 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
section 23-1044(B)(21) (Supp.1992) or Dutra v. Industrial Comm’n
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1988
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1988
General Tire Co. v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
General Tire Co. v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Gomez v. Industrial Comm’n, , Dutra v. Industrial Comm’n
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 745 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 745 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
R4-13-113(D) (Rule 13(D)), and the consideration of 4 cases decided by our supreme court—Adams v. Industrial Comm’n, , Dutra v. Industrial Comm’n, , Gomez v. Industrial Comm’n, , and W.A.
Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1986
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1986
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1986
Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1986
Grower's Pump, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 715 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Grower's Pump, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 715 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Dark v. Industrial Commission 705 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Dark v. Industrial Commission 705 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
in awarding the claimant scheduled benefits.
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Norton v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In this case we are faced with applying the Arizona Supreme Court’s , to scheduled injuries, where the claimant is unable to perform all of his pre-injury employment functions.
Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission 710 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission 710 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
However, the applicant has argued that the applicant’s
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Claimant’s second issue brings sharply into focus the interpretation to be given in scheduled injury cases to the Arizona Supreme Court’s
Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by