Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc., 653 P.2d 694.

55 citing documents.

Workers v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Workers v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Tucson, Inc., (stating that referenda are subject to strict compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements (-6 (1972))).
Az Free Enterprise Club v. Katie Hobbs Ariz. 2022
Az Free Enterprise Club v. Katie Hobbs Ariz. 2022
v. Foothills Area Coal., ARIZONA FREE ENTERPRISE CLUB, ET AL. V. HOBBS, ET AL. Opinion of the Court 49 (1982)); see also A.R.S.
Jaime Molera v. reagan/invest in Education Ariz. 2018
Jaime Molera v. reagan/invest in Education Ariz. 2018
of Tucson, Inc., –50 (1982) (invalidating referendum petitions that did not attach resolution); Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer, –6 (1972) (holding referendum petitions invalid where amendments were not made within time limits); –56 (1936) (holding that initiative failed to comply w
Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. Bower 345 P.3d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. Bower 345 P.3d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
of Tucson, Inc., Direct Sellers, 109 Ariz. at 5, 503 P.2d at 953; ¶¶ 7-9, -49 (App. 2001).
Franklin Bruce Ross v. Ken Bennett 265 P.3d 356 Ariz. 2011
Franklin Bruce Ross v. Ken Bennett 265 P.3d 356 Ariz. 2011
Sklar v. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS 207 P.3d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Sklar v. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS 207 P.3d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
of Tucson, Inc., , accordingly, our legislature has, over the years, created and amended statutes governing the proper exercise of the right of referendum.
Jeffery Harris v. City of Bisbee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Jeffery Harris v. City of Bisbee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.
Gregg Forszt And Vestar Arizona Xli, L.L.C. v. F. Ann Rodriguez and Stop O v. Outrageous Giveaways Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Gregg Forszt And Vestar Arizona Xli, L.L.C. v. F. Ann Rodriguez and Stop O v. Outrageous Giveaways Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
of Tucson, Inc., ¶¶ 14-15, -84 (2005).
Feldmeier v. Watson 123 P.3d 180 Ariz. 2005
Feldmeier v. Watson 123 P.3d 180 Ariz. 2005
v. Foothills Area Coal., -49, -97 (1982); Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer, ).
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal County 51 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal County 51 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc., , (obligation to satisfy requirements concerning attachments to petition rests solely on referendum proponent).
Hause v. City of Tucson 19 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Hause v. City of Tucson 19 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.
Lawrence v. Jones 18 P.3d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Lawrence v. Jones 18 P.3d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc., , ).
Grosvenor Holdings L.C. v. City of Peoria 985 P.2d 622 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Simpson v. Committee Against Unconstitutional Takings, L.L.C. 972 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Simpson v. Committee Against Unconstitutional Takings, L.L.C. 972 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
v. Foothills Area Coalition, , (holding similarly).
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 943 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1997
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 943 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1997
v. Foothills Area Coalition, , ).
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 930 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Sherrill v. City of Peoria 930 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.
Homebuilders Ass'n of Central Arizona v. City of Scottsdale 925 P.2d 1359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Homebuilders Ass'n of Central Arizona v. City of Scottsdale 925 P.2d 1359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
v. Foothills Area Coalition, , (petition that did not include copy of measure being referred was invalid); Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer, 109 Ariz. *649 3, 6, (omission in affidavit that petition circulator was a qualified elector destroyed presumption of validity of petition).
Barry v. Alberty 843 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Barry v. Alberty 843 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
v. Foothills Area Coalition
Wade v. Greenlee County 844 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Wade v. Greenlee County 844 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County 825 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1992
Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County 825 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1992
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc., , Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Rogers 815 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1991
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Rogers 815 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1991
v. Foothills Area Coalition, -50 , -98 (1982) (consulting Oregon cases construing referendum statute where Arizona statute was adopted in part from Oregon statute).
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale 814 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1991
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale 814 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1991
v. Foothills Area Coalition, -49 , -97 (1982); Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer
Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County 811 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County 811 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
v. Foothills Area Coalition
Mohave County v. City of Kingman 774 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1989
Mohave County v. City of Kingman 774 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1989
v. Foothills Area Coalition
Tilson v. Mofford 737 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1987
Tilson v. Mofford 737 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1987
v. Foothills Area Coalition
Kries v. Allen Carpet, Inc. 706 P.2d 360 Ariz. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by