Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc., 666 P.2d 49.

105 citing documents.

Addison v. Cienega, Ltd. 705 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
His affidavit then concludes, “I can only surmise that I then mentally decided that I had checked both ledger cards and that both cases had been answered since I did nothing further.” Pointing to the language in Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc., , *324 309, that “carelessness is not synonomous with excusable neglect,” Addison contends that the attorney’s affidavit is insufficient.
Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields 704 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields 704 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.
U-Totem Store v. Walker 691 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
U-Totem Store v. Walker 691 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Rule 60(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.; Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc., , Richas v. Superior Court, supra