Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite United Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Superior Court, 653 P.2d 691.

66 citing documents.

Addison v. Cienega, Ltd. 705 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Addison v. Cienega, Ltd. 705 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
While the mere conclusion of a lawyer or client that a defense exists is insufficient, United Imports and Exports, , the required affidavit “is not intended to be a substitute for trial on the facts” and need only show “that there is a substantia] defense to the action.”
Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields 704 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields 704 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
See United Imports and Exports, , ("We cannot presume, nor should the trial court, that an unexplained delay of approximately thirteen weeks in seeking relief is ‘prompt action’ ”); , (trial court could not assume that an unexplained five-week delay
U-Totem Store v. Walker 691 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
U-Totem Store v. Walker 691 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
United Imports and Exports
Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
United Imports & Exports
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Rapton 680 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Rapton 680 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
United Imports and Exports
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
Daou v. Harris 678 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1984
E.g., United Imports & Exports
Hawke v. Bell 663 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Hawke v. Bell 663 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
United Imports and Exports, , , Phillips v. Findlay, 19 Ariz.App.
Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1982
Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1982
Cf. United Imports & , (motion to set aside default judgment was not prompt where motion was not made until after judgment had been subject to several execution proceedings).