Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pennye, 427 P.2d 525.

48 citing documents.

In Re C.D. 377 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re C.D. 377 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
relies, P.2d 525 (1967), P.2d 189 (App. 1998), superseded by statute on other grounds, as recognized in Cons, 94 P.3d at 613.
State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See, , (“mere identity of a name ...
STATE OF ARIZONA v. THOMAS GREG McCURDY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
STATE OF ARIZONA v. THOMAS GREG McCURDY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(matching unusual names, similar physical descriptions, and reference in Texas conviction document that person convicted of felony resided in same Arizona county where defendant was arrested insufficient to establis
State v. Dixon 622 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Dixon 622 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. Mark Anthony Cons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Cons 94 P.3d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Mark Anthony Cons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
See, e.g., State v. Pennye, 102 Ariz. 207, P.2d 1322 (App .
State v. Cons 94 P.3d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
(citing State v. Salazar, 3 Ariz.App.
State ex rel. Neely v. Sherrill 815 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1991
State ex rel. Neely v. Sherrill 815 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1991
State v. Terrell 753 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Terrell 753 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
State v. Choate 725 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Choate 725 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
State v. Hall 665 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Hall 665 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
name identity alone is not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Brydges 653 P.2d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Brydges 653 P.2d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-80981-S 586 P.2d 217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-80981-S 586 P.2d 217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
as authority for the proposition that the state has the burden of establishing that he is the same individual previously placed on probation, and that its failure to do so requires reversal here.
State v. Gilbert 581 P.2d 229 Ariz. 1978
State v. Gilbert 581 P.2d 229 Ariz. 1978
State v. Cobb, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Hadley 559 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Hadley 559 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
We think the standard of proof applicable to a , and State v. Norgard, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Flores 552 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 552 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
in support of his argument that the mere identity of the name on an exemplified copy of a prior conviction with the defendant’s name is not sufficient evidence to establish a prior conviction.
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
The State must not only prove the prior conviction but that the defendant was the one convicted and the State has this burden beyond a reasonable doubt, , as it does with all other elements of a criminal prosecution.
State v. Little 455 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1969
State v. Little 455 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1969
we held that when a prior conviction is alleged the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused has in fact been convicted of the prior criminal offense.
State v. Pennye 449 P.2d 611 Ariz. 1969
State v. Pennye 449 P.2d 611 Ariz. 1969
State v. Forteson 447 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Forteson 447 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Jones 447 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1968
State v. Jones 447 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1968
we held that the State had a burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had been convicted of a prior criminal offense before the provisions of A.R.S.
State v. Norgard 429 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Norgard 429 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967