Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Collins v. Stockwell, 671 P.2d 394.
-
Escalanti v. Superior Court
799 P.2d 5
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc., , (where the language of the legislature is clear and leaves no opportunity for interpretation, the language must be followed); , (there is no opportunity for construction or interpretation of a statute if the meaning of the statutory language is clear on its face); , (where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a
- State v. Korzep 791 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Korzep 791 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Prescott Newspapers, Inc. v. Yavapai Community Hospital Ass'n 785 P.2d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Prescott Newspapers, Inc. v. Yavapai Community Hospital Ass'n
785 P.2d 1221
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
§ 1-213; , and State Farm Mut.
- Lueck v. UNITED DAIRYMEN OF ARIZONA 782 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Lueck v. UNITED DAIRYMEN OF ARIZONA 782 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1988
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1988
- State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp. 752 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp. 752 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Hanson v. Spear 734 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Hanson v. Spear 734 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Old Adobe Office Properties, Ltd. v. Gin 727 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- Old Adobe Office Properties, Ltd. v. Gin 727 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632 712 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1986
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632 712 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1986
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
- Kar Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 678 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Kar Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
678 P.2d 500
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Although the act is remedial and should be liberally interpreted, see, , *317 (1979), this principle does not permit us to “read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the Legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”