Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sanders, 420 P.2d 281.
- State v. Tapia 767 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Tapia 767 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Jackson 576 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Jackson 576 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Castoe 559 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Castoe 559 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Toney 555 P.2d 650 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Toney 555 P.2d 650 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Smith 469 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- State v. Smith 469 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Sherron 463 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Sherron 463 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Patterson 458 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Patterson
458 P.2d 950
Ariz. 1969
this court held that the trial judge’s , , we held that if there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination of voluntariness, this court would uphold
- State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- Distinguished State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- State v. Curtis 455 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
State v. Curtis
455 P.2d 988
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
the Arizona Supreme Court held that defendant’s minority is only one factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of his statements.
- State v. Hess 449 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
State v. Hess
449 P.2d 46
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
His determination that a confession is voluntary will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a clear and manifest error.”