Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Denton, 420 P.2d 930.

64 citing documents.

State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“a offenses before being entitled to an instruction on entrapment.
State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
§ 13- 1401(5)(a) (specifying sexual act occurs “[w]ithout consent” when victim coerced by immediate or threatened use of force); (“A defendant remains guilty of rape though the woman yields for reasons other than the fact that she becomes aroused and consents.”).
State v. Taylor 660 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Taylor 660 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
§ 13 — 611; , , 250 P. 366 (1926), our current statute defining rape (sexual assault), A.R.S.
State v. Williams 644 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1982
State v. Williams 644 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1982
State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
State v. Miller 628 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Miller 628 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Pierce 577 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Pierce 577 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. O'Kelley 570 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. O'Kelley 570 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
“Exclusion of witnesses is within the sound discretion of the trial court whose decision will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion and the resulting prejudice is shown.” , accord
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Howell 506 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1973
State v. Howell 506 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1973
State v. Mumbaugh 491 P.2d 443 Ariz. 1971
State v. Mumbaugh 491 P.2d 443 Ariz. 1971
State v. Dixon 485 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Dixon 485 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Murphy 482 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1971
State v. Murphy 482 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1971
State v. Harris 481 P.2d 504 Ariz. 1971
State v. Harris 481 P.2d 504 Ariz. 1971
294 P. 617 (1930); , 137 P. 550 (1913).
State v. Kidwell 475 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1970
State v. Kidwell 475 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1970
State v. Bray 472 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1970
State v. Bray 472 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1970
State v. Smith 469 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Smith 469 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
Inasmuch as there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings of voluntariness, the judgments are affirmed, , .
State v. Sherron 463 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1970
State v. Sherron 463 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1970
State v. Patterson 458 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1969
State v. Patterson 458 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1969
this court held that the trial judge’s , , we held that if there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination of voluntariness, this court would uphold it.
State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Olivas 458 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Olivas 458 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Distinguished State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969