Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite DeBoer v. Brown, 673 P.2d 912.

25 citing documents.

Satamian v. Great Divide Ariz. 2024
Satamian v. Great Divide Ariz. 2024
–71 (1983); Amfac Distrib.
MacRae v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 753 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2008
Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca 902 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca 902 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-71 , -15 (1983); Burns, 156 Ariz. at 378 , 752 P.2d at 31 .
Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 752 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 752 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See also, , Alhino v. Starr, 112 Cal.App.3d 158 , 169 Cal.Rptr.
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Croix Valley Memorial Hospital, Inc., 55 Wis.2d 628, 633 , 201 N.W.2d 63, 65 (1972); see also Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. Floyd, supra; Cf., DeBoer v. Brown, supra [ , ] (where there was no change in condition and we found no “injury”).
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Insurance 731 P.2d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Insurance 731 P.2d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
our Supreme Court held that the three-year statute of limitations began to run on the date of the injury, which was when the lesion began to grow in 1979, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
State v. Schossow 703 P.2d 448 Ariz. 1985
State v. Schossow 703 P.2d 448 Ariz. 1985
Gammons v. Berlat 696 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1985
Gammons v. Berlat 696 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1985
State v. Tramble 695 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1985
State v. Tramble 695 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1985
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
-71 , -15 (1983) we held that Landgraff stands for the proposition that the legislative intent with regard to the predecessor of the.present A.R.S.
Arizona Management Corp. v. Kallof 688 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Management Corp. v. Kallof 688 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
(court held that to state a cause of action for medical malpractice, the plaintiff-patient must have sustained some actual injury or damage from the malpractice).
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller 673 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1983
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller 673 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1983
This Court has recently considered the accrual of the cause of action in medical malpractice cases