Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. White, 426 P.2d 796.

26 citing documents.

State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(rejecting assertion that “Art. II, [§] 10 of the Arizona Constitution affords the accused in a criminal case more protection than the federal constitution”).
State of Arizona v. Tyler B. 290 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Tyler B. 290 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶10 Unlike the statements to police officers at issue in Andre M., blood evidence is not testimonial and therefore is not subject to suppression on a Fifth Amendment voluntariness basis, citing Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), and neither is the refusal to submit to blood testing
State v. Adams 891 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Adams 891 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Wedding 831 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Wedding 831 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Schmerber v. California, supra (no fifth amendment violation to take blood); , (no fifth amendment violation to take blood, breath or urine); , (no fifth amendment violation to take fingerprints); State v. Armstrong, 189 Mont.
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 721 P.2d 149 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 721 P.2d 149 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Ellis 572 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1977
State v. Ellis 572 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1977
We have held that if a sentence is within the limits prescribed by statute, we will not overturn the judgment of the trial judge unless it clearly appears that the sentence is too severe, , , or that the trial judge abused his discretion in determining the sentence.
State v. Murphree 500 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Murphree 500 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
82 , 27 L.Ed.2d 75 (1970); , State v. Stout, 5 Ariz.App.
State v. Totress 480 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1971
State v. Totress 480 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1971
State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
State v. Jordan 462 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1969
State v. Jordan 462 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1969
State v. James 459 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. James 459 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
384 , , 28 A.L.R.2d 1115 s. As to defendants Immerman and Anderson, the matter is reversed and remanded with directions that the witnesses may be questioned as to whether or not one of them was the confidential informant in this case.
State v. Roche 451 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1969
State v. Roche 451 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1969