Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite DVM CO. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd., 671 P.2d 907.

28 citing documents.

Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd., (attorney’s fees not authorized in eviction actions under previous version of A.R.S.
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd., P.2d 907 (1983); Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc., P.2d 1119 (1974).
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc. 25 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Hard Rock relies primarily on DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd., , in which our supreme court held that courts cannot award attorneys’ fees in commercial FED actions.
Rreef Management Co. v. Camex Productions, Inc. 945 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Rreef Management Co. v. Camex Productions, Inc. 945 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd,., , , 909 (1983).
Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. 880 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. 880 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd.
Jenkins v. First Baptist Church 801 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Jenkins v. First Baptist Church 801 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc. 780 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc. 780 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd.
Rapp v. Olivo 718 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Rapp v. Olivo 718 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pursuant to the rationale of the DVM Company v. Stag Tobacconists, Ltd., , we agree with the tenants that the attorney’s fees could not have been awarded under the law existing at the time of trial, and we therefore reverse the attorney’s fees award.
CORTARO WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Steiner 714 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1986
CORTARO WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Steiner 714 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1986
Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner 714 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1986
Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner 714 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1986
Kuykendall v. Tim's Buick, Pontiac, GMC, & Toyota, Inc. 719 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Kuykendall v. Tim's Buick, Pontiac, GMC, & Toyota, Inc. 719 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
“The only issue to be determined is the right to actual possession.” DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd.
Campbell v. Westdahl 715 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Campbell v. Westdahl 715 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Corp. v. Brooks Fashion Stores, Inc., , overruled on other grounds, DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd.
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Galvez 703 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Galvez 703 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Appellants concede that DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd,., , was brought to the trial court’s attention and read by it.
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985