DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pederson, 424 P.2d 810.

80 citing documents.

  • State v. Snyder 467 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
  • State v. Snyder 467 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
    1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 ; , ; , (Feb.
  • State v. Humphrey 464 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
  • State v. Humphrey 464 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
  • State v. Ruiz 463 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
  • State v. Ruiz 463 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
  • State v. Bustamante 462 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
  • State v. Bustamante 462 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
    State v. Pederson, 102 Ariz. *132 60, Certiorari Denied, 389 U.S. 867 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 456 P.2d 368 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Brown 456 P.2d 368 Ariz. 1969
    : “* * * The existence of probable cause is determined by application of an objective rather than a subjective standard.
  • State v. Dessureault 453 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Dessureault 453 P.2d 951 Ariz. 1969
    : “ * * * The existence of probable cause is determined by application of an objective rather than a subjective standard.
  • State v. Williams 452 P.2d 112 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Williams 452 P.2d 112 Ariz. 1969
    1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 ; , , (Feb.
  • State v. Vaughn 450 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Vaughn 450 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1969
    we quoted the following language from Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct.
  • State v. Pine 446 P.2d 940 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Pine 446 P.2d 940 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Dixon 440 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Dixon 440 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Payne 436 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Payne 436 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Woody 435 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
  • State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
  • State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
    State v. Valencia, 2 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Woody 435 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
    *29 A third assertion of error pertains to an instruction given by the trial court to the effect that once the possession of recently stolen goods in the defendant is established, “ * * * the burden of explaining to you how he obtained possession is upon the defendant.” This instruction is similar to, but does not contain the qualifying language of, an instruction approved 4
  • State v. Hunter 433 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1967
  • State v. Hunter 433 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1967
  • State v. Robinson 433 P.2d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Robinson 433 P.2d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967