Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Daou v. Harris, 678 P.2d 934.
- Gurr v. Willcutt 707 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Gurr v. Willcutt
707 P.2d 979
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
“[T]he presumption is in favor of retention rather than divestiture of jurisdiction.”
- Almarez v. Superior Court 704 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Almarez v. Superior Court 704 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
-
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.
700 P.2d 1342
Ariz. 1985
(presumption that the Legislature, when passing a statute, knows existing law).
- Addison v. Cienega, Ltd. 705 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
Addison v. Cienega, Ltd.
705 P.2d 1373
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
This “neglect or inadvertence is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances.”
- Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields 704 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. Fields
704 P.2d 819
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.
- City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
- City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
- National Homes Corp. v. Totem Mobile Home Sales, Inc. 682 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984