Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Michael, 436 P.2d 595.
- State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Allen 571 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Allen 571 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Rice 568 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
State v. Rice
568 P.2d 1080
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
the court held that the father of the defendant was hostile.
- State v. Young 564 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
State v. Young
564 P.2d 385
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
McLean v. People, 172 Colo.
- State v. Ulin 548 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Ulin
548 P.2d 19
Ariz. 1976
"A trial court has broad discretion to permit one to cross-examine his own witness upon an adequate showing that the witness was hostile to the party calling him.”
- State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Melot 502 P.2d 1346 Ariz. 1972
-
Distinguished
State v. Melot
502 P.2d 1346
Ariz. 1972
where the facts indicated that the defendant was questioned “for the purpose of eliciting incriminatory statements.” 103 Ariz. at 49 , 436 P.2d at 598 .
- State v. Lautzenheiser 498 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Lautzenheiser 498 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Melcher 487 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
State v. Melcher
487 P.2d 3
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Reynolds, 11 Ariz.App.
- State v. Michael 483 P.2d 541 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Michael 483 P.2d 541 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Rhymes 480 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Rhymes 480 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Brown 478 P.2d 77 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Brown 478 P.2d 77 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Riley 475 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Riley
475 P.2d 932
Ariz. 1970
that “Where requested instructions are adequately covered by other instructions of the court * * * it is not error to refuse them.” In the instant case we feel that the matters dealt with in the refused instruction No. 3 were adequately covered by the instructions given and hence no error res
- State v. Bernal 475 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Bernal 475 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Stinson 461 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Stinson 461 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Moore 456 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Moore
456 P.2d 915
Ariz. 1969
436 P.2d *548 595 ; we there upheld the trial court’s refusal to give defendant’s requested instruction on circumstantial evidence because the State’s evidence was not entirely circumstantial and the law in regard to the use and definition of circumstantial evidence was adequately covered by the other instructions.
- State v. Fields 455 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Fields
455 P.2d 964
Ariz. 1969
“A trial court has broad discretion to permit one to cross-examine his own witness upon an adequate showing that the witness was hostile to the party calling him.”
- State v. Sheffield 451 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Sheffield 451 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1969
- State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 449 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1969
- State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 449 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1969