Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere, 694 P.2d 181.

86 citing documents.

Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Truck v. Teixidor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Meere, (noting that when facts "take the case outside policy coverage, there is no duty to defend").
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Meere, (citation omitted).
Susan Ryan v. napier/klein 425 P.3d 230 Ariz. 2018
Susan Ryan v. napier/klein 425 P.3d 230 Ariz. 2018
v. Meere, (differentiating negligence from intent and noting that “the mere knowledge and appreciation of a risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent .
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
v. Meere , , 360, , 190 (1984).
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
see also Phoenix Control Sys., Inc. v. Ins.
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 169 P.3d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 169 P.3d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(rule “permit[ted] the court to create its own version of the contract and to find, or fail to find, ambiguity in order to justify an almost predetermined result”).
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
the court expressly recognized the tort of excessive force in the course of self-defense.
California Casualty Insurance v. American Family Mutual Insurance 94 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
California Casualty Insurance v. American Family Mutual Insurance 94 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-55 , -85 (1984) (quoting Steinmetz, 121 Ariz. at 271, 589 P.2d at 914).
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Brown 985 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Brown 985 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Chicago Insurance v. Manterola 955 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Chicago Insurance v. Manterola 955 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(intentional acts exclusions coincide with public policy opposing insuring against liability for one’s willful, wrongful acts)'.
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DeValencia 949 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DeValencia 949 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 939 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 939 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 927 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 927 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In reaching its decision, , which considered the subjective viewpoint of the insured regarding whether the injury, not the act, was intended (in self-defense situations).
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Brown 905 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Brown 905 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(intentional act exclusion furthers this policy by preventing an insured from acting wrongfully while secure in the knowledge that his insurer will pay the damages).
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 875 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 875 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hall v. Schulte 836 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hall v. Schulte 836 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by