Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, 677 P.2d 1292.

141 citing documents.

Capitol Indemnity v. Fleming Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Capitol Indemnity v. Fleming Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Co. v. Oberg/ Hunt/Gilleland
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland) , , 1294 (1984); Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., , (“A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which assumes the complaint’s allegations are true, attacks the legal sufficiency of the complaint”) (citation omitted).
Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A. 24 P.3d 593 Ariz. 2001
Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A. 24 P.3d 593 Ariz. 2001
¶ 26 We reached a result similar to Fickett in Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Napier v. Bertram 954 P.2d 1389 Ariz. 1998
Napier v. Bertram 954 P.2d 1389 Ariz. 1998
This Court will confront each case as it comes before us.” Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Luce v. State Title Agency, Inc. 950 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Luce v. State Title Agency, Inc. 950 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1295 (1984)).
Toy v. Katz 961 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Toy v. Katz 961 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1295 (1984) (A contractor could bring a cause of action against an architect alleging that a substantial error in plans and specifications prepared by the architect for the property owner resulted in the increased cost of construction.); see generally Case Note, Legal Profession—Attorney Liabili
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
The answer to PW’s call for privity lies in Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , where the supreme court stated, “There is no requirement of privity in this state to maintain an action in tort.” In Donnelly, a construction contractor sued a firm of architects, claiming that errors in the architects’ plans and specifications that masked significant construction co
Linder v. Brown & Herrick 943 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Linder v. Brown & Herrick 943 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , ,1294 (1984).
Buckelew v. Town of Parker 937 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Buckelew v. Town of Parker 937 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Tucson Airport Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's 918 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Tucson Airport Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's 918 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. v. Mather & Associates, Inc. 900 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. v. Mather & Associates, Inc. 900 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Rudolph v. Arizona B.A.S.S. Federation 898 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rudolph v. Arizona B.A.S.S. Federation 898 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 891 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 891 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 901 P.2d 1178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 901 P.2d 1178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
One distinction is expressed in § 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which is cited with approval by Chief Justice Gordon in Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , ...
Owens v. City of Phoenix 884 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Owens v. City of Phoenix 884 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc. 868 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc. 868 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
115 , rev’d on other grounds
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, , , 1294 (1984).
Ferguson v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross Insurance Agency, Inc. 831 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Ferguson v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross Insurance Agency, Inc. 831 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Howland v. State 818 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Howland v. State 818 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 815 P.2d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 815 P.2d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by