DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Martinez, 427 P.2d 533.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See, –18 (1978) (challenge to preliminary hearing waived by guilty plea); (claim of unlawful arrest waived by guilty plea); (challenge to grand jury proceeding waived by guilty plea).
  • State v. Neidig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Neidig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    (“[I]t is a well-settled rule of law that when a defendant voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty .
  • State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Terrell 506 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Terrell 506 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Nicholson 503 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Nicholson 503 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1972
    Benton v. United States, 352 F.2d 59 (9th Cir. 1965).
  • State v. Jones 501 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
  • State v. Jones 501 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
    which stated: “The conviction and sentence which follow a plea of guilty are based solely upon said plea and not upon any evidence which may have been improperly acquired by the prosecuting authorities (citations omitted) and, after a plea of guilty, a defendant may not thereafter question the l
  • State v. Renaud 499 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Renaud 499 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1972
    The State points out that a guilty plea “ * * * constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defenses, defects, and irregularities * *
  • State v. Linne 497 P.2d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
  • State v. Linne 497 P.2d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
    The pre-Boykin plea case, , which is very similar to the instant situation, states the following: “The trial of the cause commenced on Friday, December 10, 1965.
  • State v. Washington 493 P.2d 493 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Washington 493 P.2d 493 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. McCallister 483 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. McCallister 483 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Bridges 468 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
  • State v. Bridges 468 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
  • State v. Popejoy 450 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • State v. Popejoy 450 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
    State v. Cuzick, 5 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Churton 448 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • State v. Churton 448 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    248 (1954); , Application of Buccheri, 6 Ariz.App.
  • Application of Buccheri 431 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
  • Application of Buccheri 431 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
  • State v. Cuzick 428 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Cuzick 428 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
    As was stated in the 10 May 1967 , , it “appears from the record that defendant’s counsel bargained for a plea, and received the benefits”.