Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984, 674 P.2d 836.

28 citing documents.

Kamma v. Gaun Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Kamma v. Gaun Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
No. J-84984 (“Juvenile Action J-84984”)
Robert A. v. Dcs, R.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Robert A. v. Dcs, R.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. J-84984, vacated on other grounds, (finding the preponderance of the evidence requires something more than mere probabilities and must leave a reasonable person “satisfied and convinced of the truth of the matter”).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
1 Similarly, in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984, the court held that “probable cause requires a reasonably prudent person to find more probably than not the existence of the contested fact.”
In Re William L. 119 P.3d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re William L. 119 P.3d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Action No. J-84984, , (citation omitted).
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Saucedo v. Superior Court 946 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Saucedo v. Superior Court 946 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
§ 8-202 (Supp.1996); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984, -83 , -37 (1983).
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
M.I. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co. v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In re Juvenile Action No. J-84984
JV-111701 v. Superior Court 786 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
JV-111701 v. Superior Court 786 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984
In re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-10359 754 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-10359 754 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896 724 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896 724 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Action No. J-84984, , our supreme court interpreted the “reasonable grounds” language to mean the juvenile court was required only to determine whether it was more probable than not the enumerated factors of former RPJC existed.
Appeal in Juvenile Action J-96695 705 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Appeal in Juvenile Action J-96695 705 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In Appeal in Juvenile Action J-84984, , our Supreme Court noted that “probable cause requires a reasonably prudent person to find more probably than not the existence of the contested fact.” In State ex rel.
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Appellant notes that Arizona courts have held that “the phrases probable cause and reasonable grounds to believe refer to the same standard of proof.” Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984
Matter of Appeal in Pima County, Juv. Action 679 P.2d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Matter of Appeal in Pima County, Juv. Action 679 P.2d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84984, , In re Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-73355
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-94518 674 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1983
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-94518 674 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1983
In re Maricopa County, Juvenile Action