Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Fleming v. Pima County, 685 P.2d 1301.

75 citing documents.

Derek D. Fraser v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Derek D. Fraser v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Guertin, 178 Ariz. at 612; (plaintiff permitted to file bad faith discharge claim that raised question “outside the province” of county merit commission’s review).
Garcia v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Garcia v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
A party is entitled to prejudgment interest on liquidated claims, which exist when “plaintiffs provide a basis for precisely calculating the amount claimed,” Gemstar, 185 Ariz. at 508.
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management Services 336 P.3d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management Services 336 P.3d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
or other obligation’ so that interest begins to accrue,” DKI, 173 Ariz. at 538 , 845 P.2d at 464 , the court cited cases dealing with pre-judgment interest, , La Paz County, 153 Ariz. at 168 , 735 P.2d at 778 ; -56 , -08 (1984).
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc. 329 P.3d 1043 Ariz. 2014
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc. 329 P.3d 1043 Ariz. 2014
Ariz. Structural Pest Control Comm’n v. Taylor, ¶ 6, ( ).
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶17 Additionally, our supreme court refused to offset unemployment compensation against an award of damages for wrongful discharge, characterizing those forms of compensation as a collateral source.
STATE EX REL. AZ. STR. PEST CONT. v. Taylor 224 P.3d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
STATE EX REL. AZ. STR. PEST CONT. v. Taylor 224 P.3d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Precision Heavy Haul, Inc. v. Trail King Industries, Inc. 228 P.3d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Precision Heavy Haul, Inc. v. Trail King Industries, Inc. 228 P.3d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(wrongfully discharged employee was entitled to prejudgment interest on each paycheck as it came due, even if employer disputed its liability); Homes & Son Const. Co., , (“Mere differences of opinion as to the a
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State Tax Comm’n v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
¶ 16 , (a “claim” under the county claims statute, A.R.S.
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 917 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1996
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 917 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1996
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-54 , -06 (1984) (tort of wrongful discharge protects both at-will and non-at-will employees).
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Guertin’s , is misplaced.
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 845 P.2d 461 Ariz. 1993
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 845 P.2d 461 Ariz. 1993
See, , (citing cases); , (citing cases); -56 , -08 (1984) (citing cases).
Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon 821 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon 821 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Lee Development Co. v. Papp 803 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Lee Development Co. v. Papp 803 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Schade v. Diethrich 760 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1988
Schade v. Diethrich 760 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1988
Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co. 761 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1988
Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co. 761 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1988
Although readily recognizing that there is no perfect solution, , provides a highly instructive analog for the resolution of this case.
Arizona Telco Federal Credit Union v. Arizona Department of Revenue 764 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
ARIZ. TELCO FED. CR. U. v. Dept. of Rev. 764 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
ARIZ. TELCO FED. CR. U. v. Dept. of Rev. 764 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Arizona Telco Federal Credit Union v. Arizona Department of Revenue 764 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Peterson v. Valley *63 National Bank of Phoenix, , , overruled in part on other grounds
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
overruled in part on other grounds
Physical Therapy Associates, Inc. v. Pinal County 743 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987