Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Winter v. Coor, 695 P.2d 1094.

27 citing documents.

Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Dept. of Procurement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Dept. of Procurement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
(awarding attorney fees to prevailing party in contract dispute, upon reversal of superior court order).
Hounshell v. White 202 P.3d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Hounshell v. White 202 P.3d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache Junction 11 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache Junction 11 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Jett v. City of Tucson 882 P.2d 426 Ariz. 1994
Jett v. City of Tucson 882 P.2d 426 Ariz. 1994
61 , 1099 (1985) (finding magistrate courts part of state’s integrated judicial department and recognizing importance of public’s perception of such courts).
PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc. 877 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc. 877 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(supreme court awards attorneys’ fees for *266 trial court proceedings to successful appellant).
Smith v. City of Phoenix 858 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Smith v. City of Phoenix 858 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
(appointed judge’s tenure of less than two years is unconstitutional).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Segel 839 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Segel 839 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
(supreme court awards attorney’s fees for trial court proceedings where unsuccessful party in trial court prevailed on appeal).
City of Tucson v. Superior Court 809 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1991
City of Tucson v. Superior Court 809 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1991
To the contrary, the compelling interest here is in maintaining the quality of city magistrates, who are a “part of the integrated judicial department of this state,”
Collins v. Corbin 771 P.2d 1380 Ariz. 1989
Distinguished Collins v. Corbin 771 P.2d 1380 Ariz. 1989
the issue was the constitutionality of town codes permitting town councils to remove town magistrates at will.
State v. Mercurio 736 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Mercurio 736 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
(magistrate courts are part of the integrated judicial department of this state as contemplated in article VI, § 1 of the Arizona Constitution).
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 710 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1985
State v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 708 P.2d 1337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 708 P.2d 1337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985