Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center Inc., 695 P.2d 255.

58 citing documents.

Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Yanez v. Kundavaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Yanez v. Kundavaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ibarra v. Gastelum 471 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ibarra v. Gastelum 471 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leland v. Auto Nation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leland v. Auto Nation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DeMontiney v. Desert Minor Convalescent Ctr., Inc.
Dupray v. Jai Dining 432 P.3d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dupray v. Jai Dining 432 P.3d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Muscat v. Creative 418 P.3d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Muscat v. Creative 418 P.3d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Inc., (recognizing a special relationship exists “[w]hen an institution .
Wagner v. State 393 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wagner v. State 393 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Inc., , (holding that when a county provided mental health services through a contractor, it could not delegate “the overriding duty to provide care and treatment” to involuntary commitment patients).
Vazirani v. Annexus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Vazirani v. Annexus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
26 VAZIRANI et al. v. ANNEXUS et al. Decision of the Court attorneys incurred in attending depositions in Yuma as taxable costs under section 12-332(A)), vacated in part on other grounds, 22 ¶76 While these travel costs qualify as taxable costs under section 12-332(A), we cannot find that the superior court abused its discretion.
Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety 352 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2015
Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety 352 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2015
Inc., Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(1)(a), (4) (1965).
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLC 334 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLC 334 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
vacated in part on other grounds, P.2d 255 (1985).
Cohen v. Maricopa County 263 P.3d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Cohen v. Maricopa County 263 P.3d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
7 ¶ 17 Appellant contends, however, that under DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Ctr., Inc., , the County had a non-delegable duty to provide continuing care for Eichten even after he entered the outpatient phase of his court-ordered treatment.
Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
That section of the Restatement provides: “One who is required by law to take or voluntarily takes the custody of another under circumstances such as to deprive the other of his normal opportunities for protection is under a similar duty to the other.” See DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Ctr., Inc., , (applying Restatement § 314A and noting “duty to protect the other against unreasonable risk of harm extends to risks arising from the acts of the injured party himself’).
Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen 207 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen 207 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Inc., , see also AMERCO, 184 Ariz. at 156 , 907 P.2d at 542 (“A trial court must instruct the jury on all valid legal theories framed by the pleadings and supported by substantial evidence.”).
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Ctr., Inc.
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS. 995 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS. 995 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State ex rel. Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank 978 P.2d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State ex rel. Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank 978 P.2d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Amerco v. Shoen 907 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Amerco v. Shoen 907 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
see also DSG Corp. v. Anderson, 754 F.2d 678, 682-83 (6th Cir. 1985).
Dunn v. Maras 897 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Dunn v. Maras 897 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Stine v. Stine 880 P.2d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Stine v. Stine 880 P.2d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc., , (“[a]bsent a clear abuse of discretion, we will not disturb the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial”), approved in part, vacated in part on other grounds
Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of America 837 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of America 837 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc.
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See generally Sparks, supra; De Montiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc., -9 , -58 (1985) (county may contract with other entities to provide mental health services but is liable for contractees’ negligent acts because duty of care is non-delegable).
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
approved in part, vacated in part on other grounds
Catchings v. City of Glendale 743 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Catchings v. City of Glendale 743 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by