Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Malumphy, 461 P.2d 677.

27 citing documents.

State v. Romero 463 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Romero 463 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Corley, 108 Ariz. at 243 ( (McFarland, J., specially concurring)); (citing Malumphy).
State of Arizona v. Stephen Jay Malone Jr 444 P.3d 733 Ariz. 2019
State of Arizona v. Stephen Jay Malone Jr 444 P.3d 733 Ariz. 2019
See, (“Psychiatric testimony to negate specific intent has consistently been excluded.”); (“Arizona does not permit psychiatric evidence of a mental disease or defect negativing a state of mind.”); (concluding that the trial court properly “refus[ed] to instruct the jury that it could consider evidence of defendant’s mental condition in determining whether defendant, in fact, entertained premeditation and deliberation” as that instruction “embodies the precept commonly referred to as the doctrin
Shaka v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shaka v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978
State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978
(McFarland, J., concurring).
State v. White 520 P.2d 1132 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Harwood, supra; , , State v. Schantz, supra.
State v. Harwood 519 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1974
State v. Harwood 519 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1974
State v. Durgin 517 P.2d 1246 Ariz. 1974
State v. Durgin 517 P.2d 1246 Ariz. 1974
201 P. 91 (1921); , *253 (1965)
State v. Richardson 514 P.2d 1236 Ariz. 1973
State v. Richardson 514 P.2d 1236 Ariz. 1973
State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
State v. Corley 495 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1972
State v. Corley 495 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1972
State v. Williams 489 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1971
State v. Williams 489 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1971
State v. Shannon 478 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1970
State v. Shannon 478 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1970
Counsel’s last contention is that the court erred in its instruction on insanity and cites the test set forth in the con *450 , .