Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Oshrin v. Coulter, 688 P.2d 1001.

61 citing documents.

Montano v. Superior Court Pima County 719 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1986
In Scales we found a due process duty to preserve evidence from destruction and inform suspects of their right to analyze the evidence; in Baca we recognized a duty to collect evidence for suspects, if requested, after informing them of that right; , we acknowledged that under limited circumstances there is a further duty to inform defendants that they should test their Baca sample.
Sanford v. Phoenix Municipal Court 717 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1986
Sanford v. Phoenix Municipal Court 717 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1986
State v. Nelson 705 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Nelson 705 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See Oshrin v. Coulter, 142, 109
State v. Klein 708 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Klein 708 P.2d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Amos v. Bowen 693 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Amos v. Bowen 693 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
is inapplicable to the instant case, where an interference with a constitutional right to an exculpatory blood test is at issue, as opposed to the destruction of the second intoximeter breath sample occurring in Oshrin .
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
* , or California v. Trombetta.