Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA, 693 P.2d 895.

62 citing documents.

Appels-Meehan v. Appels 805 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Appels-Meehan v. Appels 805 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Beltran v. Razo 788 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Beltran v. Razo 788 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
holding that the trial court can modify a decree of dissolution based on a negotiated settlement agreement finalized after McCarty but before the effective date of USFSPA.
Kelly v. Kelly 774 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Kelly v. Kelly 774 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Marriage of Schmidt v. Schmidt 763 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Marriage of Schmidt v. Schmidt 763 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
justify the reopening of the decree in this case.
In Re the Marriage of Thorlin 746 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In Re the Marriage of Thorlin 746 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
We need not unduly lengthen this opinion with a case-by-case analysis of these arguments, for our supreme court’s , is dispositive.
State v. Torrez 744 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Torrez 744 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987