Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona, 703 P.2d 453.

36 citing documents.

Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Boyd v. Duraserv Corp dba/liberty Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Boyd v. Duraserv Corp dba/liberty Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (“Specific findings are not necessary, provided that the reviewing court can determine from the evidence whether the ultimate basis given by the hearing officer for his 12 BOYD v. DURASERV CORP DBA/LIBERTY INSURANCE Perkins, J., dissen
Forbach v. flagstaff/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Forbach v. flagstaff/copperpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Comm’n, -18, -62 (1985).
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Comm’n, -17, -61 (1985) (citing Reilly).
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 117 P.3d 786 Ariz. 2005
Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins Ariz. 2005
Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins Ariz. 2005
Comm’n, (stating that the constitution does not prevent the legislature from enacting specific factors to be considered “in determining whether industrial exposure is a cause of an occupational disease,” thus implicitly recognizing 4 The current version of
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 117 P.3d 786 Ariz. 2005
Comm’n, , (stating that the constitution does not prevent the legislature from enacting specific factors to be considered “in determining whether industrial exposure is a cause of an occupational disease,” thus implicitly recog *72 nizing that the legislature could enact standards for medical cau
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 90 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 90 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Comm’n of Ariz., , -62 (1985)).
Kaibab Industries v. Industrial Commission 2 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Kaibab Industries v. Industrial Commission 2 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Ford v. Industrial Comm’n
Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 975 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 975 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Ford v. Industrial Comm’n
Cervantes v. Rijlaarsdam 949 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Cervantes v. Rijlaarsdam 949 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
In contrast to Swafford , defendants here were “attempting to introduce substantive evidence under the guise of impeachment.” Ford v. Industrial Commis *401 sion, , approved in part and vacated in part
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
See Dunn, 111 Ariz. at 196, 866 P.2d at 864 (art. 18, § 8 requires compensation to be paid to both workers and their dependents); see also Alvarado v. Industrial Comm’n, , -18 , -62 (1985).
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
-14 , -58 (1985); see also Handbook, supra, § 5.3, at 5-2 to 5-5.
Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 866 P.2d 858 Ariz. 1994
Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 866 P.2d 858 Ariz. 1994
Ford v. Industrial Comm’n, , (Art. 18, § 8 prevents legislature from narrowing definition of causation).
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 845 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 845 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See generally, Ford v. Industrial Comm’n, -13 , -57 (1985).
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Phoenix Pest Control was followed by Ford v. Industrial Comm’n
Ohlmaier v. Industrial Commission 762 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Ohlmaier v. Industrial Commission 762 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Ford v. Industrial Comm’n
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986